In recent scientific estimates based on a comparison of other stars and the history of our solar system reveal a catastrophic, but we will be long gone before the fat lady sings the last note.
Announcement
Collapse
Natural Science 301 Guidelines
This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
What is the fate of our Sun?
Collapse
X
-
What is the fate of our Sun?
Last edited by shunyadragon; 09-06-2021, 08:51 AM.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.Tags: None
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostBased on observations of other stars, astronomers predict it will reach the end of its life in about another 10 billion years....
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
- 2 likes
-
mossy will be looking for a new place to stay.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mossrose View Post
I will be in heaven. And God is going to destroy the universe in His timing, so the scientists are likely wrong.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Faber View PostSo eventually global warming will be solved.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
And we don't need no cotton-pickin sun in Heaven anyway! So THERE!And once again the scene was changed,
New earth there seemed to be.
I saw the Holy City
Beside the tideless sea.
The light of God was on its streets,
The gates were open wide,
And all who would might enter,
And no one was denied.
No need of moon or stars by night,
Or sun to shine by day;
It was the new Jerusalem
That would not pass away,
It was the new Jerusalem
That would not pass away.
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostSo what is new about this? I was watching a "How the Universe Works" episode from around 2010 and they said all this.
Actually I believe the survival of humanity is more tenuous than described on the shorter term as our relationship with sun changes, and our impact on the earth,Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
This is just an interesting topic to discuss if anyone has something constructive to add.
Actually I believe the survival of humanity is more tenuous than described on the shorter term as our relationship with sun changes, and our impact on the earth,
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
Do you believe God would allow mankind to perish or destroy itself?Last edited by shunyadragon; 09-07-2021, 09:33 AM.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
You are proposing an anthropomorphic synario from a human perspective as to what God's purpose for humanity and Creation. Given the factual evidence of Creation in terms of billions of years of history of our earth, sun and universe and billions of solar systems, God's purpose and nature is far beyond the scope of the belief of any one religion, culture nor the many divisions of our beliefs. The facts also support that the stars and galaxies are born, live and pase away within our universe, and our universe may be finite in its existence, but it also may be cyclic and eternal. There is evidence that within our universe is the galaxies and solar systems are cyclic and are born again form the debri of past solar systems. The possibility remains that our physical existence may be eternal with an infinite number of universes.
Comment
-
Last I heard, the idea that the universe is cyclic or eternal had been deemed incorrect. Of course, science does tend to get revised from time to time.1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
.⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Scripture before Tradition:
but that won't prevent others from
taking it upon themselves to deprive you
of the right to call yourself Christian.
⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by tabibito View PostLast I heard, the idea that the universe is cyclic or eternal had been deemed incorrect. Of course, science does tend to get revised from time to time.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
Comment