Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
So again, i'll ask my question: instead of redefining science for what's essentially a religious project, why don't you redefine religion to incorporate some scientific features? It seems to be a more sensible approach, since religion is already interested in the existence and nature of God (or Gods).
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
Given all that, what makes you think you're capable of evaluating scientific evidence?
I'll add that it's especially ironic to make grand pronouncements about intelligent design immediately after Rogue and i were making fun of its leading proponents getting their grand pronouncements comically wrong.
Leave a comment: