Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
Nothing about that is an indication of being stuck.
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
All of those are things evolution's done. And Behe looks at precisely zero of them.
You can keep repeating a catch phrase because you like it, but doing so does not change the facts of the situation.
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
The second is that this distill's Behe's challenge of defining an unevolvable system down to demonstrating that there is no possibility of a selectable path. In other words, he has to prove a negative. Which, as we know, isn't possible. So Behe's argument distills down to a logical flaw.
Well done, Michael.
The final consequence is that, contra your repeated claims here, this isn't about probabilities. The probabilities are all secondary to a path not being selectable.
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
Your argument is nonsense. Everything about archeology is secondary to the existence of hominins.
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
If Google maps is reliable, there's also a shopping mall and convenience store less than a mile rom the site. That feels rebuilt and inhabited to me. So the conditions also depend on the semantics of things, which also means it's not repeatable.
For someone who posts a lot in a science forum, you really don't get science, do you?
Comment