Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
Think in terms of the double slit experiment falsifying the idea that photons travel as single, discrete objects. Given single photon double slit experiments, we know absolutely that this idea is not possibly correct.
Originally posted by lee_merrill
View Post
I'm using it to ask a question.
What gives you the confidence that you understand this stuff better than any scientist, despite the frequency of major errors that you make?
As for disputing things:
Did you or did you not need a script to calculate basic probabilities that were simple to figure out by eye, and after having gotten them wrong several times prior to that?
Did you or did you not engage in an argument about protein structure without even being aware of the existence of intrinsically disordered proteins?
Did you or did you not make claims about the existence of bilaterians in pre-Cambrian strata while not being aware of definitive evidence for them?
All of these happened; i'm not making any of this up.
Comment