Announcement

Collapse

Archeology 201 Guidelines

If Indiana Jones happened to be a member of Tweb, this is where he'd hang out.

Welcome to the Archeology forum. Were you out doing some gardening and dug up a relic from the distant past? would you like to know more about Ancient Egypt? Did you think Memphis was actually a city in Tennessee?

Well, for the answers to those and other burning questions you've found the right digs.

Our forum rules apply here too, if you haven't read them now is the time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Noah's ark was round?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Ged View Post
    Shuny / Lao

    Yes, but must we assume that the Genesis account was copied from these older stories that we just so happened to have found? Is it not equally as possible that the various accounts came from a common source as yet not found?

    And if they stem from a common source, could it be possible that one account (not necessarily the oldest) did a better job transmitting the original story?
    This is hypothetical reaching to far to the only motive possible is simply to justify scripture. The nature of the languages themselves goes a long way to trace the origins of the scripture. If they of course find older Hebrew scriptures or other scriptures that demonstrate a common origin, you may have a case, but based on what has been found, don't hold your breath. Considering that the region has been so thoroughly scoured, particularly the region around Israel. It is very unlikely that anything else will be found. At present were looking for scrapes. The known history of the languages is against finding any thing older too.
    Last edited by shunyadragon; 01-29-2014, 05:34 PM.
    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .

    Frank

    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Ged View Post
      Shuny / Lao

      Yes, but must we assume that the Genesis account was copied from these older stories that we just so happened to have found? Is it not equally as possible that the various accounts came from a common source as yet not found?

      And if they stem from a common source, could it be possible that one account (not necessarily the oldest) did a better job transmitting the original story?
      Dear Ged,

      Copied is wrong. Formally, we're speaking of syncretism. Informally, what we're looking at is a re-purposing. The language I use personally is "extended metaphor." The flood tales out of Mesopotamia work inside a broad theme of destruction and redemption of a chosen few. This theme is exemplified here using what I think of as the "saved from a disastrous flood" extended metaphor.

      Keep in mind that the earliest version involved only a single city, suitable for emphasizing the social bond within an individual city-state, and tied back to the archetype of that bond: their tutelary deity, ritually personified by the king in their yearly festivals. As the city-states combined to form the Sumerian empire, the Empire of Sumer and Akkad, and later the Babylonian empire, the floods in these tales grew in extent to cover the geographies of the relevant political entities, forming a wider bond between their peoples, and reflected in incrementally more powerful deities. A god of the whole world thus requires a flood that cover the whole world, or the whole world as it was known to the authors of the Biblical flood tale when it was composed.

      We can imagine an oral tale existing in tandem that somehow managed to avoid contamination from the written tales, even as they were celebrated by the entire empire during their holidays, but this is not good scholarship. More, to imagine a tale written a thousand years later is somehow more accurate turns standard criticism on its head. We always look to the earliest known biblical texts when determining authenticity of later texts, don't we? Never the other way around.

      Again, if we're looking for an actual flood behind the tales, this is not a task for textual criticism, but for archaeology, or even geology if we look even further back. Archaeology tells us there was no regional flood covering all of Mesopotamia, and geology tells us there was no global flood, either. Truth cannot contradict truth, as a well-known religious figure has famously said, tautologically.

      As ever, Jesse

      Comment


      • #18
        An ark is box. Noah's floating box and the box of the covenant.
        . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

        . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

        Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by lao tzu View Post
          Keep in mind that the earliest version involved only a single city
          What was the earliest one?

          We always look to the earliest known biblical texts when determining authenticity of later texts, don't we? Never the other way around.
          Never say never. An older ancient text is not always better. Biblical scholars often determine reliability of text, not by age of manuscript sources, but by commonality within manuscripts. So, for instance, if we found a copy of Mark from the early 2nd century that had a longer ending, it would not necessarily overturn the scholarly opinion that Mark originally had a shorter ending.

          Again, if we're looking for an actual flood behind the tales, this is not a task for textual criticism, but for archaeology, or even geology if we look even further back. Archaeology tells us there was no regional flood covering all of Mesopotamia, and geology tells us there was no global flood, either. Truth cannot contradict truth, as a well-known religious figure has famously said, tautologically.
          Well yes, textual criticism wouldn't have anything to do with anything, but nevertheless, manuscript evidence is an important tool in an archaeologist's toolbox.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 37818 View Post
            An ark is box. Noah's floating box and the box of the covenant.
            Perhaps ark means what you say, but the same word is used in Hebrew for the basket of Moses, and Noah's basket. And there was waterproofing inside out on Noah's megabasket. Anyone have nicely shaped bronze cutting tool for the trees?

            Comment

            Related Threads

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 06-22-2022, 05:02 AM
            8 responses
            33 views
            0 likes
            Last Post tabibito  
            Working...
            X