Cerne Giant in Dorset dates from Anglo-Saxon times, analysis suggests

[tabibito]

Whether or not information is sourced from Christian sites, "loony sites," or "Wikipedia" is irrelevant. If the sources cited by that site are valid, the information is valid. Also note - Wikipedia is considered unsuitable for use as a formal academic resource only because it is too readily subject to alteration. TWeb is not a formal academic site. If there is no reason for to consider the Wikipedia article's sources questionable, it is a valid resource.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Whether or not information is sourced from Christian sites, "loony sites," or "Wikipedia" is irrelevant. If the sources cited by that site are valid, the information is valid. Also note - Wikipedia is considered unsuitable for use as a formal academic resource only because it is too readily subject to alteration. TWeb is not a formal academic site. If there is no reason for to consider the Wikipedia article's sources questionable, it is a valid resource.

As rogue06 is coy about telling us his sources, we cannot verify their accuracy. However, what he wrote is a confection of muddled nonsense.

[tabibito]

As rogue06 is coy about telling us his sources, we cannot verify their accuracy. However, what he wrote is a confection of muddled nonsense.

Strangely, the information that rogue06 compares favourably with what I found years ago, and with what I am finding in current inquiries.
However, there is much conflicting information, which forces an examination of primary sources, and even there some of the translations are questionable.

[rogue06]

Strangely, the information that rogue06 compares favourably with what I found years ago, and with what I am finding in current inquiries.
However, there is much conflicting information, which forces an examination of primary sources, and even there some of the translations are questionable.

I for one don't find it strange at all

That anyone who bothers to investigate for themselves will find the same thing is probably why H_A can't address anything I said even after sneering that it was a "nonsensical claim." You would think that after that "assessment" she would be eager to demonstrate its accuracy, but for whatever reason she shows not the slightest interest in doing so.

[rogue06]

Your confection is nonsense. I asked from where you sourced it all - and you seem reluctant to reveal that. I can only assume it was garnered from some Christian site and/or the lunatic fringe.

Delicious unintended irony oozing forth from yet again from the person who cites Richard Carrier as a legitimate source and who thinks Peter was a fictitious personage (talk about fringe beliefs ). And don't think for a moment that people aren't noticing that you still haven't even tried to refute a single line of what I wrote, but instead continue to sputter impotently as you attempt to direct attention elsewhere.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Delicious unintended irony oozing forth from yet again from the person who cites Richard Carrier as a legitimate source and who thinks Peter was a fictitious personage (talk about fringe beliefs ). And don't think for a moment that people aren't noticing that you still haven't even tried to refute a single line of what I wrote, but instead continue to sputter impotently as you attempt to direct attention elsewhere.

I would recommend H H Scullard's Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic. 1981. Thames & Hudson. In part two of that work, "The Roman Year" he details every festival held, month by month.