Announcement

Collapse

Health Science 101 Guidelines

Greetings! Welcome to Health Science.

Here's where we talk about the latest fad diets, the advantages of vegetarianism, the joy of exercise and good health. Like everywhere else at Tweb our decorum rules apply.

This is a place to exchange ideas and network with other health conscience folks, this isn't a forum for heated debate.
See more
See less

Prior COVID Infection Is As Effective At Preventing Reinfection As Vaccination

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post

    Where did I suggest killing anyone? Quit using words you clearly don't understand.
    In ever accused you of killing anyone. Please respond to what I actually posted.

    Yes, your opposition to vaccination, and meaningless assertion the getting Covid-19 is in any way an alternate to vaccination or the so called 3% (?) represents the impact of Covid-19 is equivalent to advocating eugenics to deal with the pandemic. Sort of a 'survival of the fittest' is the solution.

    No a very meaningful thread anyway,

    Last edited by shunyadragon; 10-25-2021, 12:12 AM.
    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .

    Frank

    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

    Comment


    • #47
      Dennis Prager -- “I have engaged with strangers, constantly hugging them, taking photos with them knowing that I was making myself very susceptible to getting COVID,” the host said. “Which is, indeed, as bizarre as it sounded, what I wanted, in the hope I would achieve natural immunity and be taken care of by therapeutics.”


      From here.

      Interesting. I would not be inclined to go that far, even if I had his ready access to HCQ, IVM, etc.
      Geislerminian Antinomian Kenotic Charispneumaticostal Gender Mutualist-Egalitarian.

      Beige Nationalist.

      "Everybody is somebody's heretic."

      Social Justice is usually the opposite of actual justice.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post

        In ever accused you of killing anyone. Please respond to what I actually posted.
        What happens to people in eugenics exercises? Are they killed or not?


        Yes, your opposition to vaccination,
        That is a bold faced lie. I am not opposed to vaccination. I've repeated that multiple times. I am opposed to mandating vaccines for people who have already recovered from COVID.

        and meaningless assertion the getting Covid-19 is in any way an alternate to vaccination
        Burn that straw. I mad a reductio argument to make a larger point about the hypocrisy of vax Nazis.

        or the so called 3% (?) represents the impact of Covid-19 is equivalent to advocating eugenics to deal with the pandemic. Sort of a 'survival of the fittest' is the solution.
        Never said any of that. What I said was that the virus is 97% recoverable. Is that inaccurate? You vax Nazis act like getting the virus is a sure death sentence but being recovered is as inconsequential as eating a PB&J to ward off a cold.


        No a very meaningful thread anyway,
        The thread is EXTREMELY meaningful. We millions who have recovered from the virus are being treated as second class citizens and are either being forced to wear a scarlet letter or to take a shot that we just don't need. And your hand waving is what is not very meaningful.
        That's what
        - She

        Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
        - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

        I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
        Stephen R. Donaldson

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by JimboJSR View Post
          Don't think there's an easy answer to that question. A good argument can be made for never mandating vaccination. I'm in two minds about it. That said, we're WAY past the threshold where any informed, caring person should be getting vaccinated for the benefit of everyone.
          I'm pretty well informed. There is no reason I should be forced to get the vaccine.


          No idea how this follows, sorry.
          I am being told my level of protection (B), which is equal to a fully vaccinated person's (C), is insufficient (A). By the law of substitution, if A > B and B = C then A > C. Therefore, being fully vaccinated is insufficient.

          You might well be right that insisting on vacinating previously infected people will turn out to be an over-reaction which didn't add much to our fight against covid. But a low-risk intervention like this to squeeze every last bit of juice out of our vaccines isn't unreasonable.
          But forcing it is.

          Given the chaos of covid, and the lockdowns which we want to avoid at any cost, erring on the side of "too many vaccines" seems way more sensible than erring on the side of "too few vaccines".
          If the studies weren't available, you may have had a point, but there are ample studies out that show naturally acquired immunity is sufficient, durable, and long-lasting. Maybe not the highest level available, but no one is really willing to mandate that course of action for everyone, are they? So, again, we are being treated as second class citizens. Rand Paul was right.


          Honestly Bill, this really does read like you throwing a girly little strop for a silly reason.
          Count yourself lucky this is a Christian owned site and I am one of the owners, because I almost let the former Airman in me slip...

          Get some perspective, man.
          I HAVE perspective, man! The OP gave it for me.

          Millions have died, and lockdowns have caused lots of harm too.
          That is completely irrelevant to my argument here. Reinfections are rare, and severe reinfections are even more rare by orders of magnitude.

          We want to do everything we can to avoid both these things.
          Even ignoring science in the process.

          Just suck it up and take the darned vaccine.
          No. It is basically pointless for me to do so, and the increase in risk the vaccine brings isn't worth it to me. Even a small risk is an additional risk.


          Regardless of your hurt feelings regarding recognition of your immunity, the risk/benefit ratio makes sense.
          No it doesn't. Getting vaccinated proves no real benefit to me. It increases the risk of heart issues for me that I don't need to take. It provides NO guarantee that it will even work to keep me from catching COVID again and spreading it to others who may die from it, vaccinated or not. My own doctor agrees that I do not need the added risk.
          That's what
          - She

          Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
          - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

          I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
          Stephen R. Donaldson

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post

            What happens to people in eugenics exercises? Are they killed or not?
            Your misusing the concept of 'to kill.' That would be direct act to kill and not applicable in this case unless you would advocate euthanasia for those with Covid-19.

            In advocating eugenics, and rejecting vaccines people die and suffer for Covid =19, by natural selection without the real potential of surviving through taking the vaccines.



            That is a bold faced lie. I am not opposed to vaccination. I've repeated that multiple times. I am opposed to mandating vaccines for people who have already recovered from COVID.
            The thread title and your apparent intent of this thread indicates otherwise, which is decidedly to minimise the neccessity of vaccines to refuce the effects of Covid-19It is a fact that the large number of unvaccinated perpetuates the spread and contributes to more verslent vaients



            Burn that straw. I mad a reductio argument to make a larger point about the hypocrisy of vax Nazis.
            Your wiggling hypocrisy and failure to respond is very apparent, For on for many many vaccines have been legally mandated over the years, and ALL found legal by the Supreme Court. Your reverting to Nazi accusation is a fallacy guess wich one,



            Never said any of that. What I said was that the virus is 97% recoverable. Is that inaccurate? You vax Nazis act like getting the virus is a sure death sentence but being recovered is as inconsequential as eating a PB&J to ward off a cold.
            False far more Covid-19 victims are not necessarily recoverable due brain, and organ damage. Your use of these phony numbers remains cold indifference to the victims of Covid-19


            The thread is EXTREMELY meaningful. We millions who have recovered from the virus are being treated as second class citizens and are either being forced to wear a scarlet letter or to take a shot that we just don't need. And your hand waving is what is not very meaningful.
            Again so what!?!?!?!? Not meaningful when considering the spread of Covid-19 to the uninfected, which is the main issue in the pandemic.This simply true of ALL viral infections,
            Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
            Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
            But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

            go with the flow the river knows . . .

            Frank

            I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post

              Your misusing the concept of 'to kill.' That would be direct act to kill and not applicable in this case unless you would advocate euthanasia for those with Covid-19.

              In advocating eugenics, and rejecting vaccines people die and suffer for Covid =19, by natural selection without the real potential of surviving through taking the vaccines.
              You missed the point Frank. Completely. For people to obtain "hybrid immunity", the highest level of protection - what researchers are calling "the Holy Grail" of immunity - people need to get sick first. Since you agree that this is not a favorable position to take, then you are saying that being vaccinated alone is sufficient, are you not?




              The thread title and your apparent intent of this thread indicates otherwise, which is decidedly to minimise the neccessity of vaccines to refuce the effects of Covid-19It is a fact that the large number of unvaccinated perpetuates the spread and contributes to more verslent vaients
              Could you misspell one more word please? The thread title came from the linked article. Nowhere have I minimized COVID naïve people choosing to get a vaccine. It is a fact that "vaccine only" also perpetuates the spread and mutations of the virus.



              Your wiggling hypocrisy and failure to respond is very apparent, For on for many many vaccines have been legally mandated over the years, and ALL found legal by the Supreme Court. Your reverting to Nazi accusation is a fallacy guess wich one,
              I've directly responded to each of your claims. There is no scientific reason to mandate a recovered person getting the vaccine. Vaccines aren't generally recommended for someone who has recently recovered. There may be reasons for me to CHOOSE to get a post-infection vaccine, but that's MINE to choose, not pudding brain tyrants who got elected solely based on being "not the last guy".



              False far more Covid-19 victims are not necessarily recoverable due brain, and organ damage. Your use of these phony numbers remains cold indifference to the victims of Covid-19
              Way to avoid the question...


              Again so what!?!?!?!? Not meaningful when considering the spread of Covid-19 to the uninfected, which is the main issue in the pandemic.This simply true of ALL viral infections,
              It is completely meaningful. A recovered person's immunity is equal or better than a vaccinated person's. That is the conclusion of the study in the OP. So, by you saying that MY immunity is "not meaningful", then you are declaring yours just as meaningless. Good take there Frank...
              That's what
              - She

              Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
              - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

              I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
              Stephen R. Donaldson

              Comment


              • #52
                https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-.../text?r=36&s=1

                S. 2846

                To require Federal agencies to acknowledge, accept, and agree to truthfully present, natural immunity pertaining to COVID–19 pursuant to promulgating certain regulations.
                IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
                September 23, 2021

                Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
                A BILL
                To require Federal agencies to acknowledge, accept, and agree to truthfully present, natural immunity pertaining to COVID–19 pursuant to promulgating certain regulations.

                Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

                SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

                This Act may be cited as the “Natural Immunity Is Real Act”.

                SEC. 2. NATURAL IMMUNITY TO COVID–19.


                (a) In General.—Pursuant to any regulation promulgated by a Federal agency and related to the public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to COVID–19, the applicable agency shall acknowledge, accept, agree to truthfully present, and incorporate, the consideration of natural immunity as it pertains to COVID–19 with respect to the individuals subject to the applicable regulations.



                (b) Definition.—For purposes of this section, the term “natural immunity” means immunity that is naturally existing.



                (c) Rule Of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to allow for, or authorize, a Federal vaccination mandate.

                That's what
                - She

                Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
                - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

                I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
                Stephen R. Donaldson

                Comment


                • #53
                  I posted this in one of the other threads but probably more relevant here:

                  FWIW, purely anecdotal of course but my coworker who is vaccinated, has a son who was not. Son got Covid, and now co-worker has tested positive and is exhibiting symptoms. I as a covid survivor, however have not tested positive (even after being exposed to co-worker off and on for several days). I am un-vaccinated but did have covid before the vaccine was released. Also, our other co-worker, who is also vaccinated has not tested positve either...do with that what you will.
                  "What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer

                  "... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen

                  Comment

                  Related Threads

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by shunyadragon, 11-26-2021, 09:34 AM
                  10 responses
                  57 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post Bill the Cat  
                  Started by Bill the Cat, 11-15-2021, 07:52 AM
                  20 responses
                  129 views
                  1 like
                  Last Post Bill the Cat  
                  Started by Juvenal, 11-05-2021, 10:08 AM
                  6 responses
                  68 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post Cow Poke  
                  Started by Cow Poke, 11-03-2021, 01:53 PM
                  16 responses
                  141 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post Sparko
                  by Sparko
                   
                  Started by Cow Poke, 10-31-2021, 06:20 PM
                  30 responses
                  193 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post shunyadragon  
                  Working...
                  X