As an important bit of information, Fauci, CDC, NIH, and WHO should inform us how the end of the pandemic will be identified. There already was an article I had seen where a couple experts said the pandemic was over.
At some point, there should be herd immunity by those who had covid-19, those exposed to the virus without being affected by it, and maybe even those who get the experimental shots. Even with these protections, people still may get covid-19.
Now we see NZ maybe with 1 death. We see Australia going into tyrannical rule with hardly a death in their country. Then we also know that the PCR tests have been a big flop scientifically speaking -- plus the novel way that "cases" were defined as interpretations of positive PCR results rather than as people who were sick. And why should this new method of defining cases suddenly be used?
So, at some point in time, the deaths and severe cases should achieve some manageable number per year. Plus, there are ways of reducing the severity of sickness. What is this rate of deaths? Will the government hacks please inform us of this -- instead of making it a guessing game?
I think with NZ and Australia that they have gone to an extreme, ill-informed option of trying to eradicate the disease all at once. This is something that I don't think has ever been done in a year or two before. why would they be so foolish to think that they can do this now? And is it worth the over a hundred thousand deaths to achieve this goal (and as many of lifelong injuries)?
At some point, there should be herd immunity by those who had covid-19, those exposed to the virus without being affected by it, and maybe even those who get the experimental shots. Even with these protections, people still may get covid-19.
Now we see NZ maybe with 1 death. We see Australia going into tyrannical rule with hardly a death in their country. Then we also know that the PCR tests have been a big flop scientifically speaking -- plus the novel way that "cases" were defined as interpretations of positive PCR results rather than as people who were sick. And why should this new method of defining cases suddenly be used?
So, at some point in time, the deaths and severe cases should achieve some manageable number per year. Plus, there are ways of reducing the severity of sickness. What is this rate of deaths? Will the government hacks please inform us of this -- instead of making it a guessing game?
I think with NZ and Australia that they have gone to an extreme, ill-informed option of trying to eradicate the disease all at once. This is something that I don't think has ever been done in a year or two before. why would they be so foolish to think that they can do this now? And is it worth the over a hundred thousand deaths to achieve this goal (and as many of lifelong injuries)?
Comment