Announcement

Collapse

Deeper Waters Forum Guidelines

Notice Ė The ministries featured in this section of TheologyWeb are guests of this site and in some cases not bargaining for the rough and tumble world of debate forums, though sometimes they are. Additionally, this area is frequented and highlighted for guests who also very often are not acclimated to debate fora. As such, the rules of conduct here will be more strict than in the general forum. This will be something within the discretion of the Moderators and the Ministry Representative, but we simply ask that you conduct yourselves in a manner considerate of the fact that these ministries are our invited guests. You can always feel free to start a related thread in general forum without such extra restrictions. Thank you.

Deeper Waters is founded on the belief that the Christian community has long been in the shallow end of Christianity while there are treasures of the deep waiting to be discovered. Too many in the shallow end are not prepared when they go out beyond those waters and are quickly devoured by sharks. We wish to aid Christians to equip them to navigate the deeper waters of the ocean of truth and come up with treasure in the end.

We also wish to give special aid to those often neglected, that is, the disabled community. This is especially so since our founders are both on the autism spectrum and have a special desire to reach those on that spectrum. While they are a special emphasis, we seek to help others with any disability realize that God can use them and that they are as the Psalmist says, fearfully and wonderfully made.

General TheologyWeb forum rules: here.
See more
See less

What Is Necessary For Christianity?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What Is Necessary For Christianity?

    What must we really defend?

    Link

    -----

    What should really be the emphasis of our worldview? Letís plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out.

    Yesterday I wrote about the topic of evolution and why I donít debate it. It looks like a lot more people responded to that one and it sparked some debate. Some people were concerned about other doctrines that we just had to have in Genesis or else there would be no Christianity.

    Note also that this usually relies not just on Genesis being true, but a specific interpretation of Genesis being true. This is not to say those interpretations are always wrong, but it just looks like it creates another barrier to belief for some people. I have a hard enough time convincing people Jesus rose from the dead. Do I have to convince them of several other things as well?

    Usually when I deal with Christians in doubt, I always jump straight back to the resurrection. Theyíll present me with some concern and Iíll ask ďDid Jesus rise from the dead?Ē ďYes, butÖ.Ē There is no but there. Thatís not to say the objection isnít important, but letís put it in perspective. Weíre not dealing with a dealbreaker.

    One such objection often raised is the question of a historical Adam and if he was historical, was he the only human being around? At this point, I am inclined to think he was historical, but that there were others around. Adam and Eve were just especially chosen for this. There is much that can be debated about this and evolutionary creationists can hold to inerrancy and do their own studies of the text to see how it works together for them. This is not to say that their arguments will be sound, but if youíre going to take down a position like that, just one question will rarely do it.

    A few years ago I was at the debate between Craig Evans and Richard Carrier on the existence of Jesus. Now Jesus mythicism in my mind is a completely bankrupt position. Still, I donít think thereís any one question I could have asked Carrier that would have totally destroyed his position. It was multi-faceted. Personally, if you have a worldview that can be toppled by just one question, you donít have a good worldview, or at least you havenít thought about it.

    But for what is necessary, I consider it simple. Jesus is the Messiah whom God raised from the dead. It is not inerrancy that is essential. It is not the age of the Earth. This is not to say those are not important. I consider myself an inerrantist and have two ebooks on the topic. Itís not a hill Iím going to die on. My Christianity is not built on old creation either, Genesis, but on new creation, the resurrection.

    Again, this is not to say the other questions are unimportant. It is to say they need to be put on the proper level. Some skeptics have said before if there is no Adam and Eve there is no original sin and thus no need for Jesus. I consider this highly simplistic thinking. If I need a doctrine of sin, I can just turn on the evening news and see that it exists, or even better, just look inside myself.

    By the way, for the question of God, I normally do start my apologetic with a case for classical theism and then move to the resurrection, but if the conversation starts at the resurrection I can do that. If it can be shown Christ rose, attempts for anyone other than God as the agent behind that are usually pretty weak from what I see.

    In Christ,
    Nick Peters

  • #2
    Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post
    What Is Necessary For Christianity?
    Naivete. Blessed are those who believe without seeing!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by JimL View Post
      Naivete. Blessed are those who believe without seeing!
      That's totally uncalled for, Jim. Per the rules of this forum...

      ...As such, the rules of conduct here will be more strict than in the general forum. This will be something within the discretion of the Moderators and the Ministry Representative, but we simply ask that you conduct yourselves in a manner considerate of the fact that these ministries are our invited guests. You can always feel free to start a related thread in general forum without such extra restrictions. Thank you.


      Might I kindly suggest that you take your criticisms elsewhere?
      "Neighbor, how long has it been since youíve had a big, thick, steaming bowl of Wolf Brand Chili?Ē

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by JimL View Post
        Naivete. Blessed are those who believe without seeing!
        And what is necessary to tolerate JimL? A strong gag reflex and pity for cerebral dwarfism.
        That's what
        - She

        Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
        - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

        I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
        Stephen R. Donaldson

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post
          And what is necessary to tolerate JimL? A strong gag reflex and pity for cerebral dwarfism.
          I admit that there are times that reading his posts must be akin to the "guilty pleasure" experienced by those attending a carnival a century ago and strolling through the Freak Show.

          I'm always still in trouble again

          "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
          "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

          Comment


          • #6
            The poor creature doesn't realize being adopted is better than remaining a stray.
            If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

            Comment


            • #7
              Funny Jim takes one quote of Scripture and makes it his basis for dismissal, much like skeptics do with Hebrews 11:1 without reading the whole passage or defining faith as it is in the Biblical context of trust and assurance.

              Comment

              Related Threads

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by Apologiaphoenix, Yesterday, 05:29 PM
              0 responses
              6 views
              0 likes
              Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 11-26-2020, 03:29 PM
              0 responses
              13 views
              1 like
              Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 11-25-2020, 09:22 AM
              0 responses
              6 views
              0 likes
              Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 11-24-2020, 09:14 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              1 like
              Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
              Started by Apologiaphoenix, 11-23-2020, 09:22 AM
              0 responses
              18 views
              0 likes
              Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
              Working...
              X