Announcement

Collapse

Deeper Waters Forum Guidelines

Notice The ministries featured in this section of TheologyWeb are guests of this site and in some cases not bargaining for the rough and tumble world of debate forums, though sometimes they are. Additionally, this area is frequented and highlighted for guests who also very often are not acclimated to debate fora. As such, the rules of conduct here will be more strict than in the general forum. This will be something within the discretion of the Moderators and the Ministry Representative, but we simply ask that you conduct yourselves in a manner considerate of the fact that these ministries are our invited guests. You can always feel free to start a related thread in general forum without such extra restrictions. Thank you.

Deeper Waters is founded on the belief that the Christian community has long been in the shallow end of Christianity while there are treasures of the deep waiting to be discovered. Too many in the shallow end are not prepared when they go out beyond those waters and are quickly devoured by sharks. We wish to aid Christians to equip them to navigate the deeper waters of the ocean of truth and come up with treasure in the end.

We also wish to give special aid to those often neglected, that is, the disabled community. This is especially so since our founders are both on the autism spectrum and have a special desire to reach those on that spectrum. While they are a special emphasis, we seek to help others with any disability realize that God can use them and that they are as the Psalmist says, fearfully and wonderfully made.

General TheologyWeb forum rules: here.
See more
See less

Book Plunge: Four Views on the Historical Adam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Book Plunge: Four Views on the Historical Adam

    Not much of a shock that I side with Walton.

    http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/20...storical-adam/

  • #2
    Just curious why you think there is more evidence for a historical Adam than for not. What evidence are you referring to?

    Comment


    • #3
      Mainly Biblical evidence. I leave the science to those who study science. I cannot argue for or against there.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post
        Mainly Biblical evidence. I leave the science to those who study science. I cannot argue for or against there.
        Ah, in that case, if you're only considering biblical evidence, the bible supports a historical Adam completely. Every character referencing the first couple undoubtedly believed Adam and Eve were historical.

        Comment

        Related Threads

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by Apologiaphoenix, Today, 09:14 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 likes
        Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
        Started by Apologiaphoenix, Yesterday, 09:22 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 likes
        Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
        Started by Apologiaphoenix, 11-20-2020, 02:15 PM
        0 responses
        25 views
        2 likes
        Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
        Started by Apologiaphoenix, 11-19-2020, 05:37 PM
        7 responses
        73 views
        0 likes
        Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
        Started by Apologiaphoenix, 11-18-2020, 08:54 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        1 like
        Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
        Working...
        X