// Required code

Announcement

Collapse

Deeper Waters Forum Guidelines

Notice The ministries featured in this section of TheologyWeb are guests of this site and in some cases not bargaining for the rough and tumble world of debate forums, though sometimes they are. Additionally, this area is frequented and highlighted for guests who also very often are not acclimated to debate fora. As such, the rules of conduct here will be more strict than in the general forum. This will be something within the discretion of the Moderators and the Ministry Representative, but we simply ask that you conduct yourselves in a manner considerate of the fact that these ministries are our invited guests. You can always feel free to start a related thread in general forum without such extra restrictions. Thank you.

Deeper Waters is founded on the belief that the Christian community has long been in the shallow end of Christianity while there are treasures of the deep waiting to be discovered. Too many in the shallow end are not prepared when they go out beyond those waters and are quickly devoured by sharks. We wish to aid Christians to equip them to navigate the deeper waters of the ocean of truth and come up with treasure in the end.

We also wish to give special aid to those often neglected, that is, the disabled community. This is especially so since our founders are both on the autism spectrum and have a special desire to reach those on that spectrum. While they are a special emphasis, we seek to help others with any disability realize that God can use them and that they are as the Psalmist says, fearfully and wonderfully made.

General TheologyWeb forum rules: here.
See more
See less

Another Bad Atheistic Argument

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Another Bad Atheistic Argument

    Is the universe too big for God?

    Link

    ------

    Does the size of the universe prove there is no God? Let’s plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out.

    I check writings of atheists often and I got a blog notification this morning of an atheist blog that will remain nameless. I commented once in response to a post here and soon found my comments being moderated while my opponents got to keep going on. Underhanded movements in comments are something that cause me to ignore someone very quickly.

    But today, I see a post about proof of atheism. Hey. I gotta see what this stellar argument is. As I expected though, I was gravely disappointed. This argument as not stellar at all, other than that it was about space.

    The idea was about how vast the universe is and we can’t explore it all and how many stars there must be out there. Why would a being of omniscience or omnipotence do this? Now that is a good question. I leave it to the more scientifically minded to address it. However, the author made no attempt to answer and just said that we don’t know what brought about the Big Bang, but it sure wasn’t God.

    Because, well, reasons I guess.

    Now notice this. This argument just points to something we don’t know and assumes right off that there can be no good reason for this. Considering how limited our knowledge of the universe really is, isn’t that a hasty conclusion to make? Why should we think there’s no good reason for it?

    Not only that, suppose I have several philosophical arguments for God, like the Thomistic arguments, that are deductive arguments such as the conclusion is reached with certainty from the premises. If so, then those arguments trump an “I don’t know” argument any day of the week. I can just as well say back, “I don’t know either” and still have my strong case for theism.

    We’re also often told that religion stops people from answering questions and science goes “Let’s find out!” Well where is that scientific attitude here? Instead, it’s just “I don’t know” and then “It’s not God.”

    The argument is also actually theological. “If there is a God, He would not create this way.” Really? How is that known? Where is this data coming about that if a god exists of any kind, He wouldn’t create in such and such a way?

    Even if we granted the challenge to monotheism, couldn’t we hypothetically say that perhaps polytheism is instead true and atheism is still false? After all, the world of comic books is a world populated with several planets and universes and such, and yet it is often a world teeming with gods. Of course, I don’t think that is true, but that would still be enough to show atheism still has work to do.

    If you’re an atheist, please don’t engage in such lazy thinking. If you want to make a claim about how God would or wouldn’t do something or why He would or wouldn’t, bring some data. Where do you get this knowledge of God and what He is like? Also, it is not effective to say, “I wouldn’t do it this way.” Okay, but I think we can all agree you’re far from omniscient and omnipotent and it’s just ridiculous arrogance to think you can come anywhere close to that.

    A lot of self-respecting atheists would not make this kind of argument out there. They’d actually be agreeing with a lot of what I say in this post I suspect. There are bad arguments for theism and bad arguments for atheism. We should make it a point to eliminate both wherever we see them.

    In Christ,
    Nick Peters
    (And I affirm the virgin birth)

  • #2
    Great points, Nick. Also it assumes that God - an omnipotent being - is in some way limited as to what He can create. But if God is omnipotent, then it is no more effort for Him to create 10 billion galaxies than it would be to create 10 million stars. He can do both equally as easily relative to His unlimited power.

    Another example of an atheist mentally picturing God as basically just a really powerful human who lives in the sky.
    ...>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...

    Comment


    • #3
      I know Douglas Adams was an outspoken atheist, but I can't help but think of the scene in one of the Hitchhiker's Books where a man was punished by being shown an image of how insignificant he was in the context of the universe. The man instead marveled at the grandeur of the universe. I am skeptical of the apologetic attempts to read modern science into books like Job, but I think the poetical depictions of the size of universe in there illustrate that Christians shouldn't see this as a problem, either.
      "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

      Comment

      Related Threads

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by Apologiaphoenix, Today, 10:06 AM
      0 responses
      10 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
      Started by Apologiaphoenix, 10-16-2020, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
      Started by Apologiaphoenix, 10-15-2020, 09:44 AM
      3 responses
      36 views
      2 likes
      Last Post ReformedApologist  
      Started by Apologiaphoenix, 10-14-2020, 09:09 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
      Started by Apologiaphoenix, 10-12-2020, 09:02 AM
      7 responses
      76 views
      2 likes
      Last Post ReformedApologist  
      Working...
      X