Originally posted by Sea of red
View Post
I never get the sense that Acts is relaying written prophecy to us and I so I don't really see that argument at all. Besides that, Paul's death is implied in certain passages of Luke-Acts so I also don't see the argument there either - and most of critics of all striped don't too.
Lots of literature that was deemed heretical or ant-christian bit the dust when Christianity became the dominant force in Europe, and I doubt Christian would have liked us to read his full on work. Stuff that challenged the doctrines of that time just didn't get a chance or if it did, it wouldn't be for long before it caused a stink. But you're missing my point. My point is, we don't have any of the earliest writings of those first critics, and so we don't really know what was or wasn't said in full.
Comment